PandaBuy raid · timeline
The PandaBuy Raid: Why It Happened, What Was Seized, and How the Cases Ended
Checked · the PandaBuy Alternatives desk
Short answer
On April 11, 2024, the Changning branch of the Shanghai Public Security Bureau led raids on PandaBuy with about 200 officers, acting on complaints from brand owners. According to an account published for the brands, they seized over 200,000 pairs of trainers and millions of packed parcels, froze RMB 230 million and placed 40 suspects under criminal measures. PandaBuy never reopened. A separate US lawsuit froze more than $16 million of its assets, but a New York judge lifted that freeze on January 14, 2025. Wikipedia records a verdict in the Chinese case in April 2026.
8 finds that never depended on PandaBuy
Plain Weidian listings, so whichever agent you use can open them. Each tile goes to repbuysheet.com. We cap the grid at 8 finds so it loads quickly; behind it sit 10,000+ products.
-
📷 5
ShoesAsics Running Shoes [7 styles]
$61.89 ¥374.40
Note ASICS stands for 'anima sana in corpore sano', a sound mind in a sound body.
Photos & sizes ↗ -
📷 11
Tees & Shirtsadidas Soccer Jersey
$15.12 ¥96.00
Note 1951: adidas bought the three stripes from Finland's Karhu.
View item ↗ -
📷 5
Tees & ShirtsHuman Made T Shirt [40 styles]
$17.02 ¥102.96
Note 2010: Nigo's Human Made, vintage Americana with a heart logo.
Price & variants ↗ -
📷 2
Tees & ShirtsInter Milan Jersey
$15.84 ¥95.68
Note 1899: AC Milan; red-and-black stripes give the 'rossoneri' name.
All the pictures ↗ -
📷 6
Hoodies & Knitwearsynaworld Hoodie
$25.82 ¥163.90
Note Syna World belongs to London rapper Central Cee.
Open listing ↗ -
📷 14
Tees & ShirtsRalph Lauren Polo / Lacoste Polo Long Sleeve Shirts
$43.10 ¥273.60
Note 1933: René Lacoste stitched the crocodile onto his tennis shirts.
See it on repbuysheet ↗ -
📷 4
Hoodies & KnitwearCORTEIZ Long Sleeve Sweater [34 styles]
$24.75 ¥157.08
Note London, 2017: Clint419's Corteiz, known for the Alcatraz logo and surprise drops.
Photos & sizes ↗ -
📷 15
Accessoriesversace chain reaction
$37.25 ¥236.50
Note 1978: Gianni Versace adopted the Medusa head from Greek myth.
View item ↗
Sponsored links. Photo, name and button all open one listing on repbuysheet.com, where the seller's full photo set, the size options and the source shop link live. Dollar and yuan prices are copied from that catalog on the check date and move with the exchange rate.
PandaBuy's raid, dated from start to finish
The raid wasn't a single event but the end of an investigation that began months earlier, with a data breach landing in the same fortnight:
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| November 2023 | City of London Police's Operation Ashiko begins looking at PandaBuy (Wikipedia) |
| March 31, 2024 | Data on 1,348,407 PandaBuy accounts is posted on a hacking forum |
| April 2024 | 16 brands take legal action; in New York, six labels sue PandaBuy's Hong Kong company |
| April 8, 2024 | PandaBuy's app receives its last update |
| April 11, 2024 | Raids on PandaBuy's offices and warehouses begin |
| April 13, 2024 | World Trademark Review reports six warehouses raided |
| April 15, 2024 | PandaBuy posts a statement calling the situation 'challenging' |
| January 14, 2025 | US judge dissolves the injunction freezing PandaBuy's assets |
| April 2026 | Verdict in the raid case; pandabuy.com taken offline (Wikipedia) |
Sources at the foot of the page. The April 2024 statement and WTR report are dated from Know Your Meme's event timeline.
Two things stand out. The investigation had a British police unit involved from the start, which shows how far the brands' case reached beyond China. And the breach and the raid were unrelated events that happened to coincide, which made the first days confusing: many users thought the site was down because of hackers.
Verdict: The raid was the end of a months-long case, not a surprise inspection. There was no warning to customers.
What did police seize from PandaBuy?
Most of the detail comes from a single source written for the brand side: an April 24, 2024 article published by Managing IP as sponsored content from the investigators who supported the operation. Read it with that in mind. It says the Changning branch of the Shanghai Public Security Bureau led the operation with support from police in several provinces, and lists:
- over 200,000 pairs of trainers, with branded footwear making up over 90% of the seizure;
- millions of pre-packed parcels covering products of more than 200 brands;
- RMB 230 million in frozen assets;
- 40 key suspects placed under criminal coercive measures, with more expected;
- a warehouse footprint of over 100,000 square metres in Huizhou and more than 2,200 staff across 20-plus cities.
The same article attributes RMB 39.6 billion of 2023 revenue to PandaBuy. We repeat it only because it's widely quoted; no independent figure exists, and it is the brands' number, not PandaBuy's. Wikipedia's summary gives a slightly different picture of the raid, with over 200 police and about 50 private investigators involved and the company's Hangzhou base among the sites searched.
Verdict: The seizure figures are large and come from the brands' side. The court outcome is the more reliable record, and it's thinner.
How did the court cases end?
Two legal tracks ran at once, and they ended differently.
In New York, King Spider LLC v. Panda (Hong Kong) Technology Co. (case 1:24-cv-02668) was filed in April 2024 by six labels including SP5DER, Off-White, Denim Tears, Palace, Loewe and Rhude. They won an early order freezing more than $16 million. On January 14, 2025 Judge Jessica Clarke dissolved it, finding the brands hadn't shown they were likely to win: PandaBuy, she wrote, appeared 'to only act as a valet between third-party e-commerce websites and the end user'. A request to restore the freeze pending appeal was refused the next day, and an appeal was docketed at the Second Circuit as 25-137; we couldn't find a published result.
In China, the raid was a criminal matter, and the 'valet' argument didn't help there. Wikipedia records a verdict in April 2026 and the website being taken offline, but we couldn't locate the judgment, so sentences and amounts aren't something we can report.
The contrast matters for anyone choosing an agent now. US civil courts have been reluctant to treat an agent as the seller, but Chinese authorities can act against one directly, and that's where the risk to customers' parcels and balances comes from.
Verdict: PandaBuy won the US civil round and still closed. The legal risk that ended it applies to agents in China generally.
What happened to PandaBuy customers' parcels and money?
For customers the raid meant three losses at once:
- Parcels in the warehouse were sealed with the rest of the stock. We found no account of customers getting them released.
- Wallet balances were frozen with the company; CNBuyPilot found bank, crypto and gift-card recoveries were essentially nil.
- Parcels already shipped were outside the warehouses, so their fate rested with the carrier and customs in the buyer's country rather than with PandaBuy.
The habits that would have limited those losses are the same ones that matter today: ship hauls promptly, don't park money in an agent's wallet, and keep the original Weidian or Taobao links rather than the agent's. Those links are why an old PandaBuy spreadsheet is still worth converting; the PandaBuy link converter does that, and the status board lists the 23 agents open at our last check.
For the question we're asked most since the raid, whether PandaBuy might return, see is PandaBuy back.
Verdict: Customers lost what was inside PandaBuy at the moment of the raid. Nothing kept outside it, including the links, was lost.
PandaBuy raid questions
When was PandaBuy raided?
The raids started on April 11, 2024, according to Managing IP and the Know Your Meme timeline. Two days later, on April 13, World Trademark Review reported six warehouses searched, and on April 15 PandaBuy posted a statement calling the situation 'challenging'. Customers got no warning beforehand. Treat that April date as the end of PandaBuy: it never resumed ordering afterwards.
Why was PandaBuy raided?
Brand owners complained that goods passing through PandaBuy infringed their trademarks, and 16 brands took legal action in April 2024. The case was months old by then; Wikipedia says the City of London Police began looking at PandaBuy in November 2023. Shanghai police then led the operation. The underlying issue was trademark law, and that risk applies to agents in China generally.
Who raided PandaBuy?
The Changning branch of the Shanghai Public Security Bureau led it, supported by police from several provinces and, by Wikipedia's account, about 50 private investigators. British involvement started earlier: Operation Ashiko, run by the City of London Police, began in November 2023. Those are the agencies on record, and Wikipedia puts the police count at over 200. The dated timeline on this page is the clearest summary to rely on.
What was seized in the PandaBuy raid?
A brand-side account published by Managing IP lists over 200,000 pairs of trainers, millions of pre-packed parcels covering more than 200 brands, and RMB 230 million in frozen assets, with 40 suspects placed under criminal coercive measures. It also describes over 100,000 square metres of warehouses in Huizhou. No independent figures exist. Read those numbers as the brands' claims; the court outcome is the firmer record.
Did PandaBuy win its court case?
Partly. In New York, Judge Jessica Clarke lifted the freeze on more than $16 million of assets on January 14, 2025, describing PandaBuy as acting like a 'valet' between websites and buyers; an appeal was docketed as 25-137 with no published result. In China the raid was a criminal matter, and Wikipedia records a verdict in April 2026. The US win didn't save the business.
Were customers arrested after the PandaBuy raid?
We found no report of any customer being arrested. The 40 suspects in the brands' account were people tied to the business itself. Buyers' losses were financial instead: parcels sealed in the warehouses and wallet balances frozen, with CNBuyPilot finding bank, crypto and gift-card recoveries close to nil. Ship promptly, pay per order and never keep a balance to limit that risk at any agent.
More after The 2024 raid, step by step
Fact check: The 2024 raid, step by step
Put together by the PandaBuy Alternatives desk; every claim was checked against the list below on . The PandaBuy history leans on court records, police-side reporting and Wikipedia; agent fees, storage and review counts come from each agent's own pages or the named trackers. Where sources disagree we print both. A finds tile was only published if its main photo and its link showed the same item.
- Managing IP — PandaBuy raided by Shanghai police (brand-side account, Apr 24, 2024) (managingip.com)
- Wikipedia — PandaBuy (en.wikipedia.org)
- Know Your Meme — PandaBuy warehouse raids (timeline) (knowyourmeme.com)
- The Fashion Law — judge dissolves the PandaBuy injunction (Jan 2025) (thefashionlaw.com)
- Eric Goldman's Technology & Marketing Law Blog — King Spider v. PandaBuy (blog.ericgoldman.org)
- Justia — Second Circuit docket 25-137 (King Spider appeal) (dockets.justia.com)
- Security Affairs — PandaBuy data breach of 1.3 million customers (securityaffairs.com)
- CNBuyPilot — PandaBuy hub: closure, refunds, alternatives (May 2026) (cnbuypilot.com)